【www.guakaob.com--成人英语三级】
Comments for Blood Diamond
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
For your information, this review contains mild spoilers of the film's storyline.
Blood Diamond had a lot of potential. It had opportunities for action, compelling situations, compelling characters, etc, but it didn't seem to fully realize them.
There were plenty of moments of action, but they seemed to always be filmed with a shaky camera and quick cuts. Sure, that might make it seem more like you're there, but it got pretty old pretty fast. The audience began to not know what was going on or where the main
characters were or where the bad guys were. This really subtracted from several scenes that could have been very memorable, like a rebel invasion of Sierra Leone's capital city Freetown.
Much of the movie revolved around the rebel forces of the RUF in Sierra Leone, who
kidnapped the son of Solomon Vandy (Djimon Hounsou). Solomon is then taken prisoner by the RUF and forced to dig up diamonds. South African smuggler Danny Archer (DiCaprio, now surely one of the best actors, not only of his generation, but in moviedom today) learns of a diamond worth quite a bit of money that Solomon had found, and most of the movie follows Solomon as he searches for his family and Archer as he searches for the diamond. Archer tells Solomon with the money they could make with the diamond, finding his family would be a breeze, so they stick together. Reporter Maddy Bowen (Jennifer Connelly) hooks up with the pair upon learning of Archer's connections to conflict diamond corporations and their
important people. Wanting to really help the victims of the conflict, Maddy helps Solomon and Archer on their quests so that she can get information on the conflict diamond dealers and take them down.
Solomon's son is forced to fight for the RUF, and becomes a completely desensitized, killing machine. This could have been very, very powerful, but it wasn't quite as heart-wrenching as it could have been. It does, however, provide for a great, gut-wrenching moment of tension later in the film. Solomon himself is played well. Hounsou plays him with a sense of innocence, and we do care about him and his journey to find his family. Connelly, too, is an idealistic journalist who wants to help the world, and we come to believe that her well-intentioned
motivations are completely genuine. DiCaprio, as always, is terrific. I'm not completely sure what a South African accent should sound like, but his seemed convincing enough to me. He is a man on a mission, and we believe it. It was especially a treat to see his character develop. The best thing about Archer's development is that, while he goes from being selfish to selfless, it's not unbelievable or clichéd. He doesn't just become a good guy, he convincingly
transforms from (a closet racist) anti-hero to hero. All around good and great acting in Blood Diamond.
The end concludes with a political message somewhere along the lines of Lord of War, which kind of killed the mood, but it's certainly nice that the movie is actually about something important (i.e. conflict in Africa that, according to Maddy, we might catch on the news somewhere "between sports and weather").
Blood Diamond is done well, but not quite as well as it could have been. Still, it made for a good movie, one of the better of 2006, and I'm glad I saw it.
8/10
Was the above comment useful to you?
Locations in Africa and where it was filmed..., 22 January 2007
I served with the military in Liberia during 2005 and have also been in Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast and at the border to Guinea. As many African countries it's not always to safe to travel around due to impacts of years of civil war and rage. Despite this I believe that they portrayed the movie very fine with the infrastructure and climate to make it seem like it was shoot in Sierra L. To make an example with the movie "Lord of war" with Nicolas Cage where he goes to Monrovia, Liberia to sell weapons to warlords. Well, for one who's been there several times, patrolling the streets, this was a terrible choice of location when I right away saw that the infrastructure was all wrong and it was shoot God knows where!?
I think it was great movie that shows how civil war and human brutality exceeds anything you【血钻影评】
possible can imagine. This kind of things happens everyday in the world and we just pass it, zapping with the remote, through all our TV channels. It's definitely worth seeing. Was the above comment useful to you?
Brilliant and eye opening film, 22 January 2007
Blood Diamond was one of the best I've seen in a while, although I knew of the violence that went on in Sierra Leone I was too young to actually know what and why it was happening so this film has totally opened my eyes to what went on. The story was told in a brilliant way showing you both from where the diamonds came and where they would end up but the way in which it was told was seamless.
Leonardo Dicaprio was brilliant as Danny Archer, I didn't expect him to be this good as he's always had this baby face playing youngsters so I couldn't seen him pulling off the role of a South African diamond smuggler but he did so brilliantly . Djimon Housoun was also very good as the proud fisherman searching for his family his role was more subdued than Dicaprio which, I think, is why they worked so well together. So I would say a must see.
Was the above comment useful to you?
A knife in the heart feels better, 21 January 2007 Jennifer Connelly looks beautiful and a knife in the heart feels better for Leo DiCaprio when he's happily pierced to death for the worth of the blood diamond and a last call his mystifying love interest who defies the conventional white wedding to stop the injustices done to the good African people like Djimon Hounsou who escapes with Leo's help and the blood diamond to win his case in court to stop the illegal smuggling of diamonds. It's nice to see a movie that shows what is really going on in Africa. Leo's accent seems too sentimental for the brunette he's always wanted and could never conquer without kissing up. It was a touchy subject that used mystification to handle and made it up there with Leo's most excellent performances. It was Jennifer Connelly's best!!! Compelling scenery deserving of Leo's fight and my vote for oustanding lead male.
Was the above comment useful to you?
Shocking, 20 January 2007
Edward Zwick has crafted a wonderful movie. It is a great escape ride, and somehow manages to be a deeply moving human drama, as well as a political thriller. It is hard to determine its genre, and that's one of the many reasons this was one of the best movies of 2006.【血钻影评】
Solomon Vandy (Djimon Hounsou) is an African father who lives in Sierra Leone during 1999. Civil war is everywhere. One day, while walking his son home from school, rebels attack his village. He knows and understands that these rebels are ruthless, and kill without mercy. He tells his son to hide behind a boat. Solomon races to the village to help his wife and other kids escape. However, in the process, Solomon and his son are the ones who are captured. He (Solomon) is sent to dig for conflict diamonds under the strict supervision of the rebel RUF. One day, he finds a large, pink diamond. He understands that this rock could influence his son's freedom. He takes the diamond and hides it. The story eventually makes it to diamond smuggler and former mercenary, Danny Archer (Leonardo DiCaprio). He believes that this diamond, is "his ticket out" of Africa. He understands that it must be worth some millions to the diamond industry back in London or the United States. Archer agrees to help Solomon get his son back if he gets the diamond in return. It is also the story of Maddy Bowen (Jennifer Connelly), an American reporter who is intrigued by Danny's role in the illegal diamond trade. All three must find a way to come together, or else none of them will get what they want. Or need.
Leondardo DiCaprio has grown so much as an actor. I never thought very highly of him. He was always OK. Then I saw Martin Scorsese's "The Departed." As Billy Costigan he blew me away in that masterpiece. Now, he delivers another superb performance. When it comes to Leonardo DiCaprio, I will start looking for his movies more often. He is wonderful here. Some critics have complained of his accent. Why? Many South Africans have said that is is very accurate. They have sounded off in the message board. So have people who have been to South Africa or know those who are from there. The accent is true, and there is nothing annoying about it. I wonder if those who complain about the accent have any association with Africa? Sorry, I got off track. Jennifer Connelly is wonderful here as well, a good actress in a
role not based on looks. Djimon Hounsou gives the performance of the movie. He is shockingly emotional and deep. I will be surprised if he does not get an Oscar nod.
The screenplay by Charles Leavitt, off of a story by Leavitt and C. Gaby Mitchell, also
deserves and Oscar nomination. It it made up of so many elements, layers, violence, and heart. It is deep. It is wonderful.
Edward Zwick (Glory, The Last Samurai), uses his amazing ability as a director to shoot this artistically crafted picture. This movie is nowhere without him.
Africa has had many horrible things happen in it. I'm not saying other countries haven't, but here Africa is the focus, and to know that some of this is still happening is gut-wrenching. The murder and genocide there never seems to stop. This is a film that wants to tell people there's hope. Hope for a better world. It is a moving film. A lot of what we see is disturbing, but life can be disturbing, and this film doesn't shy away from it. It uses its disturbing content to move you into action. Yes, there has been an act to stop the selling of conflict diamonds in over 40 countries. However, illegal diamonds still make it to the market. This movie will make the most serious diamond-lovers reconsider what they're paying for. Any movie that has the ability to make you rethink and take action, was very well-made. Wonderful.
Danny Archer: Sometimes, I wonder; will God ever forgive us for what we've done to each other?
Was the above comment useful to you?
Hard-hitting viewing!, 20 January 2007
Film Review: Blood Diamond
Leonardo DiCaprio; Djimon Hounsou; Jennifer Connelly and Arnold Vosloo
Greed and gratuitous violence coupled with some stellar performances
血钻观后感
钻石与武器的交易，靠利益扭在一起。钻石是非洲的特产，哪里越富有，哪里就越贫困。 动乱的时候就会有利可乘。非洲动荡西方组织为了利益用钻石与武器做交易。利益最大化。
冲突钻石带来的思考
文学院对外汉语1204班於江林
你可知道，一颗璀璨的钻石背后也许藏着一段血腥肮脏的故事？
血钻，又称滴血钻石、冲突钻石、血腥钻石，是一种开采在战争区域并销往市场的钻石。依照联合国的定义，冲突钻石被界定为产自获得国际普遍承认的，同具有合法性的政府对立方出产的钻石。由于销售钻石得到的高额利润和资金会被投入反政府或违背安理会精神的武装冲突中，故而得名。这个名词现在已经被全世界所知晓，也逐渐成为大家所关注的对象之一。泰勒被指控用钻石交易的收入购买军火装备来帮助塞拉利昂叛军打仗。因为牵涉许多人命，所以被称为“血钻”。【血钻影评】
非洲的土地为什么是红的？Danny（莱昂纳多）说：“是战争的鲜血染红的。然而战争不是为了独立和自由，而仅仅是为了占有，占有象牙，占有石油，占有黄金，占有钻石。为了占有，军阀连年混战。为了占有，儿童被训练成杀人机器，派上战场。”不知道有多少人看过《血钻》这部电影，但我相信看过这部电影的人都必定会收到深深的震撼，为自己所未知的地狱式生活中的人们，为人类的贪婪凶残·《血钻》以塞拉利昂1999年的内战为背景。电影中寻找儿子·
的父亲所罗门说：“等他们长大了，和平也到来了。”然而当他潜入基地找到自己的儿子时，儿子却已经变成了六亲不认的地域天使。差点杀了自己亲生父亲。 如果知道这一切，你是否还会购买钻石？
同样的血腥不单发生在钻石行业，也不单发生在非洲。皮草业是一个典型
的例子，想想《可可西里》--在某种程度上，《可可西里》比《血钻》更真实、更有力量，在我们看到高原上被偷猎的藏羚羊的森森白骨，当我们的仇恨正要生起时，我们却看到了另一面，看到了盗猎者无助的眼神，看到了他们因为家园沙化而只能干起五块钱剥一只藏羚羊皮的营生。刹那间，仇恨空无所指，道德和价值判断分崩离析，只剩下我们安坐在城市作为旁观者和法官的沾沾自喜和自以为是，赤身露体，无处藏身。
这不是某个人、某个群体或者某个集团的问题，这是每个人的问题。军阀和盗猎者是罪恶的，商业集团是罪恶的，然而更大的罪恶却在于我们每个人的内心，来源于我们世世代代留存下来，而今更变本加厉的贪欲。
跨国协议可以减缓甚至终止钻石的非法卖卖，却没有办法消解人的贪欲。劝说人们停止购买某一类"罪恶"商品亦无法消解，因为贪欲这条毒蛇依旧盘踞在人的心中，怡然自乐。无法从钻石上得到的满足，必定会通过其它途径发泄，或者是别的奢侈品，或者是种种不道德。
两千年前的战争只是一小片土地上的流血，一百年前变成了全球的流血，到了六十年前，核武器的出现彻底提升了战争的能量，战争的后果可以影响几代人，永久性地损害我们的土地、海洋和天空。如今，任何一个军事大国的核武器都足以毁灭地球几十次，这给了我们无穷的想象：不需要真正的战争，只需要一条错误的情报或者一个狂妄的领袖，就足以让地球陷入万劫不复。
这带给我们许多启示。对个人而言，现代的贪欲来自于我们自身的不安全感。我们怕自己或者害怕别人认为自己不够漂亮，不够年轻，不够强壮，不够忠诚，不够富有，不够有品味，于是假借外物，通过护肤品、伟哥、鲜花、钻戒、名车、房产、学历等等来证明自己。社会的贪欲也来自不安全感，而这种
不安全感的根源在于社会为了维持其自身的运作而对需要越来越多资源，当资源有限并且不可再生时，焦虑便产生了。其实我们不需要这样，我们需要更加注重内心，注重自己的内在，避免冲突奢侈品的购买，不要让我们的欲望成为别人犯罪的动力，成为许多无辜者的灾难。资源是有限的，我们应加以合理利用。
一场还魂者的信仰论
记者团秘书处 沈伟伟 在《泰坦尼克》里你爱深情浓，《猫鼠游戏》里你玩世不恭，《盗梦空间》里你困于情网，《了不起的盖茨比》里你一往情深，也记得你在《被解救的姜戈》眼前一锤定音，也曾在《禁闭岛》上不懈追寻。如今你改头换面做了《荒野猎人》，如果不能摘到奥斯卡王座上的血钻，我怎能甘心！这一届的奥斯卡，莱昂纳多.迪卡普里奥这个名字，终于让一切扬眉吐气。 这是一部有意思的电影，我喜欢这样说。认识亚利桑德罗·冈萨雷斯·伊纳里多，是从去年他的那部具有强烈讽刺意味但又饱含着艺术的辛酸的《鸟人》开始的。这位满脸胡茬的墨西哥导演用他那自然而深刻的导演风格，以及不惜运用一切手法达到他的天才设想的个性，征服了无数奖项，也征服了包括我在内的无数影迷。除了新作里凌厉荒蛮的气质让人动容，影片的摄影同样无与伦比，摄影师（《鸟人》《地心引力》摄影师）擅长长镜头、旋转镜头，每一帧画面无可挑剔，展现出无与伦比的壮美奇观，荒野景象，浩瀚壮阔。
很多朋友说，这是一个关于复仇和生存的故事，但穿越表层文本之后，还有另一层。生存为一，复仇为二，其三还是回归本源，也是人究其一生想弄明白的，信仰
丰子恺先生曾将人的生活分作三层：一是物质，二是精神，三是灵魂——在我看来，导演亚历桑德罗探讨的也是触及第三层的信仰层面。
从影片伊始小李饰演的猎人格拉斯便没有闲下来过，先是遭到苏族人的袭击匆忙上船，而后遭到熊袭，几乎奄奄一息，唯有他于波尼族女子诞下的儿子一直守护着他，但也因为这样儿子惨遭同伴毒手，自己被弃至于荒野。汤姆·哈迪饰演的菲茨杰拉德有着极其明确的行动动机，即不顾一切地为了个人利益而活下去，为此不惜牺牲身边任何人，和小李饰演的格拉斯或者另外的白人军官奉行的共存理念不一样。十九世纪起，大批白人趋之若鹜地来到北美，掠夺资源倒卖借此大发横财，贪欲与血流染指原住民的土地。一路上格拉斯险情不断，前有仇人，后有原住民追击，好歹遇到一个落单的波尼族人，伸出援手相救，但也落得被吊死的下场。格拉斯本有机会偷夺法国人的马离开，但是看见苏族人的女儿被强暴，还是冒险搭救了一把，一命抵一命，这也让他结尾免遭苏族人取了性命。骑马而去的格拉斯还是不巧被追击，坠崖，暴风雪中脱衣赤身躺进马的身体，像是回到诞生之前，再从温热子宫之中重生一次。到最后总算被自己的同伴搭救，知道菲茨杰拉德因恐惧自己不远万里前来复仇，深入丛林做最后一战。在故事最后猎人格拉斯和仇人菲茨杰拉德几乎了结决斗，小李子只要补上最后一刀便能完成复仇大任时，他看了看河对岸的波尼族人，念念有词了一句：“The revenge is in God’s hand’s, not mine.” 而后将其从河岸中推至水中，让菲茨杰拉德的身躯随着河水流向原住民，被他们手刃。如同圣经里所说：不要因私报仇，让主审判，复仇在我，有冤必报。然而这样所谓的正义究竟带来了何种畅然？
依稀记得《冰血暴》第一季里，杀手Malvo曾经给小警察Gus出过一个谜题，即为什么人的眼睛能分辨更多的绿色灰阶。后来警察Molly为他解答了这个谜题：“因为人是捕食者。”正因如此，可以在森林中更好地保护和自卫。人类进化到现在，在文明冠冕堂皇的笼罩下做着看似体面的事，然而日光之下无新事，拔地而起的摩登森林取代了以往的丛林，社会高度分工化的时代，肉弱强食只不过换了一种模式，因为人类可以从其他模式中寻求食物替代，猎物与猎手的关系只不过进化到了另一种状态，看似更体面实则更荒唐。反观回来，荒野之中唯有不断进化出更加精巧的生存能力才能得以生息下去，人眼尚且如此，何况人心。复仇这种情结一旦完成，便只能遁入虚无，更别说因为血染而逐渐破败的信仰——看似有一副释然的身躯，却了然如空壳，只能在风雪之中看着心爱之人与复仇心结逐渐远去，徒然呼吸而已。
精神分裂
看起来这个标题有些犀利，那么谁能保证你我他之中没有人存在这样的精神问题，关于这个病症，据统计发生概率是人口的1%。而且贫富的不同也影响着发生的比例。生活条件，经济条件底下的人们之中的比率相对较高。这些都是在我想要写这个内容时才看到的资料，真实的起因是因为同学推荐的一部悬疑恐怖电影——《致命ID》。恐怖电影说实话我看的不多，但这部电影堪称经典中的经典，看过后我确实也是这样感觉的。之后我又看到了两三部与之类似电影，《禁闭岛》，《机械师》，《黑天鹅》什么的。整体比较起来，还是ID看起来更胜一筹。下面开始具体的分析这几部片子。
重点：悬疑
虽然都是精神分裂的电影，但是贯穿始终的，最吸引观众的还是类似侦破案件的悬疑气氛。致命ID的剧情是在最后给人揭秘，最后几分钟令人惊喜的是更有一个小情节的出现。禁闭岛则选择了在故事的结尾也没有给人一个准确的答案，给观众的是更多遐想空间。机械师跟ID类似，也是在结尾给观众了真相。在这里我并不断言哪种方式更好，我觉得这跟影片的整体表现是分不开的。关于这类精神分裂的悬疑电影，出现最多的是不合情理的场景或者人物，对话等，这些与现实冲突的地方正是分裂症状的体现，也是最后让观众知道谜底时候恍然大悟的起因点。在这些不符合逻辑的片段上，后两部片子可是下了不少功夫，禁闭岛中反复出现的丹尼斯妻子被火烧死和腹部流血不止的死亡画面，还有对纵火犯的几次控诉，都为影片揭秘埋下了伏笔。机械师中主角家中冰箱门上的便签，多次给了特写，并且便签的内容多次别更改，也是故事结局时给人顿悟的地方。ID并没有给人什么明显暗示性的情节，这也是把这部片子谜底留在最后的必要条件吧。
条件：分裂人格
ID里出现了11个分裂人格（都是一个人分出来的），禁闭岛和机械师都是相对普通的出现了两个。这也是为什么ID看起来这么屌了，刨去分裂出来11个这种情况的现实可能性，严谨的故事情节要包裹住这11个分裂人格确实要费劲不少。多重人格寄宿在一个现实本体之中，并且有明显的外在表现和行为，违反了正常人们思维和行为习惯，因此这是故事离奇和让人猜不透的主要地方。同时，影片的镜头转换和剪切也加强了分裂效果的表现，心里蒙太奇，时间蒙太奇等的运用。影片ID结尾处胖子在镜子中看到了分裂出来的警官，发现自己的病症并未被治好。禁闭岛里拉昂纳多妻子的幻影反复出现并与他对话。这些都是精神分裂症状的表现手法。
起因：患者背景
精神分裂病症的产生有很多种因素。遗传因素，根据调查，发现本病患者近亲中的患病率比一般居民高数倍。与患者血缘关系越近，精神分裂症的发病率越高。有关孪生子的研究预告，本病单卵孪生的同病率比双卵孪生一般高4~6倍，寄养子也是如此。内分泌因素，本病大多在青春期前后性成熟期发病，部分病人在分娩后急性起病。社会环境因素，本病的发生多是由于在幼年至成年生活中的困难遭遇而造成的，其中与精神分裂症亲属的接触是致病的主要因素。脑结构异常，CT和MRI的研究，发现约30%～40%精神分裂
症病人有脑室扩大或其他脑结构异常。脑室扩大也可见于初次发病的早期精神分裂症病人或精神分裂症高发家庭子女发病前的青少年。推测这可能是病人早年罹患中枢神经系统疾病的反映。另有其他的不明确的发病原因。
当然这是现实中的病因，而在电影中编剧还是喜欢选取其中一种较普遍，也较容易开展故事的病因——社会环境因素。
有学者认为，社会心理因素在精神分裂症发生中起决定性作用，国内12个地区的精神疾病流行病学调查资料显示。经济水平高与经济水平低的人群患病率不同，差别有显著性，在业人群与不在业人群的患病率也有显著性差异，这可能与生活的物质环境差、经济贫困所造成的心理压力大、社会心理应激多有关。精神分裂症多发生在经济水平低或社会阶层低的人群，为国内外本病患病率调查的地区分布特点所证实。
这也就是那些存在怨念或者精神压力的人们报复社会的原因了，让我们看看影响他们神经系统崩溃的具体原因。《致命ID》，在胖子小的时候，她的母亲是个妓女，偷东西，虐待他，所以胖子小时的时候做了这首诗 当我上楼时,碰见一个原本不在那里的男人（暗喻我碰到了一个不在现实中的人格）,今天他还是不在那里，我希望他离开了。（暗喻我要控制胖子，我才是他唯一的人格，我希望他滚蛋）这就是胖子自小培养出的邪恶灵魂人格的心声。《禁闭岛》，这个背景就相对丰富了。首先，时期，1954年，美苏正处于冷战的敏感时期，而主角则是一名退役的军人，曾经目睹了不少残酷的暴力和鲜血琉璃的场面。另一面，他患精神病的妻子溺死了自己的三个孩子，他一怒之下枪杀了妻子，面对整个家庭的破裂，他疯了，从而产生幻觉，并在大脑中产生了侦探故事的版本。《机械师》，一年前崔佛开车过十字路口的时候撞到了尼克拉斯，但是他却因为害怕负责任而逃逸了，接下来因为心中的内疚而导致失眠，接着是因为自己的疏忽导致工友米勒失去了一条手臂。
不难发现，以上三部片子中，精神分裂发病的原因都是因为以前受到的刺激，有主动的，也有被动的。这些原因构成了故事的发展，也是患者自身逃避现实，逃避自我的点。犯罪的人格和善意的人格相互缠绕，影响患者的行为和思想。暴力倾向的产生是此类悬疑片的推动器。
表演：演技
对于精神病患者的演绎，后两部片子体现的较为充分。ID中由于本体的出现时间很短，表演的时间并不是很多所以并没有给人很深的印象。其演员表演的重点主要是那几个人格的表演上。禁闭岛，主演 莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥，大家一定都很熟悉，出演的电影数不胜数，最著名的泰坦尼克号，早期的不一样的天空，在我看来在青年时期的演技已经是相当的纯熟了。在后来的盗梦空间和血钻等电影里更是让人印象深刻。而且这并不是他与导演的第一次合作，在美版无间道中和其他电影中就有多次的合作。对于这位大帅哥加实力派，出演这样一部名导指导的悬疑电影，票房问题看来并不用担忧了，可惜的是这部片子的上映在刚刚落幕的奥斯卡颁奖典礼之后，不知道还能不能在这么长一段时间后还能让评委们难忘。复杂的剧情还有多重身份的来回转化，考验着导演和演员的功力。看起来莱昂纳多还是牢牢的把握着这个角色，在充当FBI探员时，一丝不苟，细致入微的观察，和搭档在医院医生和精神病人之间周旋，充分的表演出了出色的警官一角。而换成妻子杀了自己3个孩子的丈夫一角上，痛苦和思念纠缠着他，也是
演绎的相当到位。
机械师中，我看剧情在这三部片子中算倒数老大了。但为这部片子加分的地方就是克里斯汀·贝尔的表演了。让人印象深刻的是他为了出演这部片子减掉了60磅体重。为了减肥，贝尔每天只吃1罐金枪鱼和一个苹果。他创造了演员为角色减掉63磅的纪录。后来，在2005年的《蝙蝠侠归来》中，他的体重又恢复了正常。看着影帝级别的演员这么卖力的为电影贡献力量，我真是跪了，折服了。也就是这么一来，主角以前的胖子角色和现在的消瘦角色形成了巨大反差，也蒙蔽了大部分观众，在故事结尾才发现这俩熊人是一个主儿这么一回事。饰演了这位几年都没有睡觉的工厂机械工，还要正常的工作，被精神病折磨的不轻，面容消瘦，身材嶙峋佝偻，外表的强力体现加上贝尔的老辣演技，出色的演绎了这位杀了人之后产生人格分裂的苦逼机械师傅一角儿。
在ID中，演员的表演被分到了几位主要的人格上。这11个人各自不同，自私，邪恶，懦弱，勇敢，冷静，善良等，每个都是人类心中的一个侧面，分开演绎也是最后揭秘时候让人觉得倒过来看觉得影片安排的很合理缜密的地方。影片的另一个引人注目的地方是它的演员阵容，约翰·库萨克、雷·利奥塔、阿曼达·皮特、克丽·杜瓦尔、阿尔弗莱德·莫里纳，个个都是响当当的名字，同时因为主要故事情节均发生在一所封闭的汽车旅馆中，演员的表现至关重要。关键性角色艾德的扮演者约翰·库萨克大家应该很熟悉了，他出生演艺世家，父亲里查德 ·库萨克和姐姐琼·库萨克都是著名演员，库萨克曾与伍迪·艾伦合作过《子弹横飞百老汇》，和伊斯特伍德合作过《午夜善恶园》，还有斯派克·琼斯那部诡异的《傀儡人生》，似乎有库萨克参与的片子总是会有那么一点与众不同的吸引人的地方。
谈到这次演出《致命ID》，库萨克说，除了能与其他九位各具特色的演员一起合作这点很有趣外，影片具有的与他以往表演经历相反的风格也令他觉得很新鲜，“一般的片子多半是人物带动剧情，而《致命ID》里，情节已经足够抓人，我觉得人物就好像棋盘上的棋子，全然被牵着走，这个体验太难得了。”
上面我分析了几个影片的因素，它们都是构成片子骨架的零件。除了这些，电影悬疑的情节，到位的配乐，剪辑的艺术，场景的安排等等我就不慢慢说了。查到弗洛伊德的一些研究成果，发现在这类片子中有些地方引用了他的一些观点，最明显的是心理防御机制，弗洛伊德认为自我为解决超我与本我之间产生的冲突，会使用心理防卫机制。若适当使用，防御机制可减缓超我与本我间之冲突，但过度或过当使用，而不正视面对冲突，则会造成焦虑或产生罪疚，最终将导致如抑郁沮丧的精神失衡。防御机制有否认，合理化，投射，压抑，转移等，这在患者被指认出行为事实时，通常会采取的手段来逃避现实，回到自己思想中理想的状态。还有就是一些常见的人们通常可见的如潜意识，前意识，和意识的关系；本我，自我，超我；生死驱力什么的。虽然不是什么重要的东西，但一部好电影要经得起推敲，这些必要的理论知识是少不了的。
看了三部片子我觉得我自己都快分裂了，有点儿魔怔。前一段有个同学还说想拍个关于精神病的纪录片来着，让我和他一起去郑州八院调查，我
说我没空去，过几天我再问他，他说被人家医生给轰出来了。我调侃说幸亏没有顺道把你给逮进去就不错了，现在看来请神病的群体确实需要关注，以前看着那群神神叨叨的疯子就避而远之，自从了解了相关的资料发现这群人虽然有些对社会存在危害但是同时也被病痛折磨的很深，是很痛苦和无助的。况且部分由于经济和家庭原因无法得到应有的治疗，在此也呼吁一下关爱病人，远离病痛。也希望社会和不靠谱的政府能给予他们必要的帮助。引用了一些网上的资料，有影评，也有精神分裂症的相关信息。写的不专业，都是瞎评，吐槽。见谅，见谅了。
上一篇：难忘的一件事5分钟演讲
下一篇：小学工会换届选举校长致辞2016